Peer Editing Checklist
Reviewer: ; Author: ; Topic:
For each item below, indicate strengths and weaknesses by placing a checkmark in the appropriate box.
THEN, provide written evidence at least once within each shaded category section, for either an area of strength or of weakness.
|
Area |
Strength |
Weakness |
Evidence |
|
ORGANIZATION & DEVELOPMENT |
|||
| Introduction | |||
| Engaging title | |||
| Interest grabber, “grabs” your attention | |||
| Clear three-fold thesis statement | |||
| Body | |||
| Fluid paragraphs | |||
| Evidence or details support main idea | |||
| Feature to Feature or Subject to Subject | |||
| Ideas or evidence presented logically | |||
| Overall essay, supports thesis statement | |||
| Conclusion | |||
| Conclusion is present | |||
| Restatement of thesis is present | |||
|
FOCUS, CONTENT, & VOICE |
|||
| Paper addresses assignment | |||
| Quotes are added as concrete details | |||
| Persuasive: essay points and details are believable. | |||
| Tone is professional, informative, & engaging | |||
| Writing is appropriate for intended audience | |||
|
CLARITY IN VOCABULARY, WORD CHOICE, & USAGE |
|||
| Written in standard English (NO SLANG) | |||
| Few if any clichés or use of jargon | |||
| Correct verb tense (PRESENT) | |||
| Word choice is clear and precise | |||
| Little if any redundancy | |||
| No First person | |||
| Dead Words | |||
|
SENTENCE STRUCTURE |
|||
| No run-ons or comma splices | |||
| No fragments | |||
| Sentence variety present | |||
|
MECHANICS |
|||
| Agreement between subjects and verbs, pronouns, and antecedents | |||
| Consistent point of view, number, and tense | |||
| Correct spelling and capitalization | |||
| Correct use of punctuation | |||
|
DOCUMENTATION (if required) |
|||
| Uses citation style correctly in body of paper | |||
| Uses citation style correctly in reference list | |||
Additional comments (something the author does well or suggestions for additions to strengthen paper):